Future fuel
Staff Photo, Vincent Vala
Jerry Dossey connects a prototype of a hydrogen unit he is developing to the battery of his car Wednesday afternoon in the Lakeview subdivision of Culpeper. Dossey doubled the gas mileage in his Jeep Wrangler with the device.
As gas costs flirt with the $4 a gallon price tag, one Culpeper man decided to take matters into his own hands, literally.
With plastic tubes and metal plates bought from Lowe’s — and a portion of his three kids’ college savings — Jerry Dossey has built a prototype of a hydrogen fuel cell that he says doubled his gas mileage and essentially turned a conventional car into a hybrid.
Dossey, 30, is still working out the kinks, but he demonstrated the ability of the seemingly innocu-ous white plastic canister to produce explosive hydrogen.
In the driveway of his home Wednesday, Dossey linked the cell to his shiny black Aspen’s battery and the technology explained itself.
As the metal plates inside the canister slowly began to electrolyze a small amount of water, the hydrogen and oxygen cells separated. Hydrogen flowed through a clear plastic tube and water vapor collected in a trap.
Because of the explosiveness of hydrogen, a metal piece — called an arrestor — intercepts the stream of gas, preventing the possibility of an explosion.
“Everything I was able to build this from came from the hardware store,” he said.
Once the cell is actually installed and connected to a car’s engine — in the Aspen he will fit it behind the grill — the hydrogen would stream into the airflow, extending the life of the gasoline.
When he installed the device in his bright yellow Jeep Wrangler, Dossey said his gas mileage jumped from 14 mpg to 27.
After leaving his job as sales manager at Chrysler of Culpeper, Dossey has spent the past three months developing his fuel cell. He has placed orders with metal and plastics manufactures to build 60 cells and plans to sell them for $250 a piece to earn back the savings spent.
“The only reason I’m selling them is not to become rich and wealthy,” he said. “The whole point is to help people who need it.”
Because the technology is nothing new, Dossey is not patenting his idea.
In fact, he even offered to explain the construction plans to anyone who was interested and will have detailed information on his Web site.
“(Dossey) is one of those very determined people that when he’s interested in something, he goes after it 150 percent,” said Joe Schick, a manager at Chrysler of Culpeper and Dossey’s former coworker. “I think hydrogen is the way to go.”
Dossey was determined to alleviate fuel costs for the average American after a former Chrysler of Culpeper customer who asked for help.
He could no longer afford his diesel truck and risked losing his home.
“That’s a breaking point,” he said, “when you see a grown man like that break down. And I couldn’t help him.”
After months of research, Dossey had constructed his prototype cell. He hoped to sell the fuel cells, but would not install them in anyone’s vehicles.
Because the installation requires drilling a hole into a part of the engine, it voids a car’s warranty. But that is the only drawback, Dossey said.
“Anybody who comes up with an idea to double up fuel, I think it’s a good idea,” said Vernon Bunch, manager at Gilmore’s Auto Service and Repair. “The future’s going to be in electric cars.”
After demonstrating the fuel cell’s capabilities in his driveway, Dossey packed up his tubes and canisters into a cardboard diaper box and reiterated his reasons for his pet project.
“It’s not about making money,” he said. “It’s about making sure that people aren’t losing their homes. This has just gotten too bad.”
Catherine Amos can be reached at 825-0771 ext. 138 or .
Want to know more?
To contact Jerry Dossey about his fuel cell, e-mail him at . To learn more, visit his Web site at DosseyCreations.com
What are the benefits of a hydrogen fuel cell?
The U.S. Department of Energy describes hydrogen as a versatile carrier that can be used to power nearly every end-use energy need. According to the DOE, the fuel cell - an energy conver-sion device that can efficiently capture and use the power of hydrogen - is the key to making that happen.
The DOE states that fuel cells have the potential to replace the internal combustion engine in vehicles and provide power in stationary and portable power applications because they are energy-efficient, clean and fuel-flexible.
Hydrogen-powered fuel cells are pollution free - the only byproducts are pure water and heat - and can have two to three times the efficiency of traditional combustion technologies.
“Hydrogen can play a particularly important role in the future by replacing the imported petro-leum we currently use in our cars and trucks,“ according to the DOE Hydrogen Program.
According to the DOE, the gasoline engine in a conventional car is less than 20 percent efficient in converting the chemical energy in gasoline into power that moves the vehicle under normal driving conditions. Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles, which use electric motors, are much more energy efficient.
That corresponds to more than a 50 percent reduction in fuel consumption, compared to a gaso-line internal combustion engine.
SOURCE: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY HYDROGEN PROGRAM
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
There is a very similar article by Skip Miller in the July 31st Culpeper Times.
What bothers me about these articles is that they appear to be based on only one source, Jerry Dossey. I expect journalists (and their editors) to do a little more research before publishing “facts” about astounding new developments. And a single trial run by the developer of the gadget, in which fuel use is measured by filling up at a gas station, is a laughable measurement of the gadget’s effectiveness; yet reading Miller’s and Amos’ articles indicates that this is all that was done, and that it was enough for them.
Oh, the quote from DOE’s Hydrogen Program refers to a completely different technology. It isn’t a second source: it is irrelevant.
The science of this is valid. NASA has been using liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen in their spacecraft to generate electricity with the by product of drinkable water since before the days of the Apollo missions.
The reverse is happening here of using electrolysis to divide water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen. A similar process of electrolysis happens inside of car batteries. Ever hear of someone blowing up a battery while trying to jumpstart it? That’s because vapors were escaping.
Battery power starts your car. Once the engine is running, the alternator recharges your battery for the next motor start. Once it is recharged, the battery serves as a capacitor, dampening surges and losses of electrical power as the engine RPMs fluctuate.
In other words, while the engine is running there is plenty of electrical power to spare. Do you really think turning on/off your radio or headlights significantly affects your mileage?
I can’t vouch for this MythBusters show because I don’t have television. I can tell you that a catastrophic failure makes for better T.V. ratings.
If you are not willing to try this with your own vehicle, they make a children’s toy which puts the science of this into practice:
http://www.gizmag.com/go/5651/
If this is more within your budget, please play and learn. It’s meant to be an educational toy.
Thomas Edison blew up a lot of glass bulbs before he perfected incandescent lighting. NASA lost a few rockets back in the day, too. I wouldn’t equate these HHO fuel cells with snake oil or Cold Fusion just yet. Jerry Dossey is quoted in one of the papers that the results can vary significantly depending on the vehicle and driving conditions. I’ll be there Saturday to see what he has accomplished.
Sorry but dismissing people who want proof as just skeptics doesn’t cut it. There is simply no way anyone can double their gas mileage with this.
Check this review, again they’re not selling anything:
http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2008/07/water4gas.html
Con artists selling cancer cures, weight loss medications, and gas saving gadgets have been ripping off “your average Joes” for years….
Why hasn’t some car company put one of these in their car? GM and Ford are tanking, they’d love to double gas mileage. The answer is always that they’re in bed with the oil companies.
Yea right…
you defy the laws of science and logic and i’m a “skeptic” because i don’t believe.
Hopefully we can get a few people to hesitate before they cough up hard earned cash that might be used to put food on the table..
The automotive editor at Popular Mechanics has an article on this stuff:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/automotive/new_cars/4271579.html
He’s going to build one, lets see what he says, he’s not selling anything either.
There are skeptics everyday living in the past with closed minds but living today on ‘dreams that were’ - whom still feel that an airplane can not fly and that ‘dreams will never be’. Yet they will travel around the world literally in hours or talk to someone on their cell-phone as they are driving or shopping.
No matter what is proven to work, these skeptics will always be thorn pricks of the future, trying every aspect to destroy conceptual dreams and discourage those with hope for a better future. However they will be there in the end to be part to the “I told you so!“ group whether good or bad.
An invention is not always the perfect answer to a discovery/method or vice versa. However, it may be a part of many pieces and collectively coming together that they form a better discovery/solution for tomorrow, sometimes the parts of the whole come in time. Scientist have a theorem ‘That A Radically New Idea/Discovery with importance goes through three stages of evolution: 1), Deny that it is true!; 2) Deny that it is important!; 3), Then ALL will claim “I discovered it first!“ or they will credit the wrong person.‘ The evolution may take days, months, years, decades, or centuries.
For the many skeptics that I have faced and proven to them that there is great potential in this simple device and it works! The HHO-Fuel Cell captures many ideas/parts from a suppressed knowledge factor dating over a 100 years ago and is proven to have beneficial results in today’s current environment. I.E. Michael Ferriday’s, 19th Century, Law of Lost Energy (Hydrogen) from Water (or the loss of energy was too great to recover), has been taught in science classrooms of prep-schools, universities, and collages as the final answer. This Law of Lost Energy - reflects results of studies and experiments conducted with materials of yesteryear. Advanced to modern day - the same studies conducted with material of today have 7, 10, and even 100 times greater results than Ferriday over 100 years ago. Skeptics, people with a PhD and Engineers living in yesteryear with closed minds fail to see the future.
The chance of this doubling gas mileage is next to zero. If this works GM would be putting on their cars, wonder why NO automobile company is doing this.
And gas have been $8 a gallon in Europe for a decade. This is essentially perpetual motion. There is no science behind this.
Last time it was magnets in the fuel line, tornado wind generators in air filter and none of that works.
This paper needs to employ reporters with at least a modicum of education in science.
To promote this guy’s web site is totally irresponsible.
Trust me on this, i’ve got a PhD in chemistry and unlike this guy, i’m not selling anything..
Yep, saw that episode of MythBusters! And those guys were lucky they weren’t blown to smithereens! They absolutely had no idea of what they were doing. There are hundreds of thousands of “average joes or jerrys” working on hydrogen fuel cells and the concept is safe if you know what you are doing. Check out youtube and you’ll find other “Jerry Dosseys” doing the same thing. Right here in the Northern Virginia area there several who are working on hydrogen fuel cells. And they do work! The hardest part is finding the space under the hood car(or wherever) to mount the mechanisms!
Busted by Mythbusters. See Season 4, Episode 53, “The Great Gas Conspiracy” Not only busted… but they point out dangerous too! Have you checked with your insurance company to see if doing this modification invalidates the insurance?


Advertisement