Confusion, anger over closure at In Motion
When a well-known sports and dance center in Warrenton abruptly closed this month, transferring dance classes to Culpeper, it left many parents confused and demanding refunds.
It also left unanswered questions about the business’s future and financial stability.
In Motion Sports and Dance Center, located in a warehouse-type facility at 615 Falmouth St., ceased operations with little warning Feb. 10.
Managing Director Terri Erwin-Fitz said she closed the complex and transferred dance classes to the downtown Culpeper studio because of “some issues with the building,” which she rented.
In an unsigned e-mail Feb. 10, In Motion Dance staff informed customers of the closure and commencement of classes in Culpeper Feb. 11.
Class times were adjusted to allow for participants’ extra commute, and the e-mail directed all questions or concerns to Culpeper staff. Erwin-Fitz’s name was not used in the correspondence.
Parents upset
The one-day notice of classes moving to Culpeper angered many parents, including Danielle Rice of Warrenton and Kara Illemszky of Jeffersonton. Citing inconveniences, they are canceling membership and demanding refunds.
Culpeper, Rice said, “is not an option for me. I e-mailed and called Terri a number of times and got no response at all. Her manager in Culpeper called me and said I was forfeiting any fees already paid because I was in violation of contract.”
Rice is seeking $242 in costume and class fees for her daughters’ prepaid hip-hop classes.
“I don’t know her reason for moving,” Rice said, “nor do I really care. It would have been nice if she’d given us some notice. She left for whatever reason and needs to give that money back.”
Jeffersonton resident Kara Illemszky may live in Culpeper County, but said the switch was inconvenient for her family because her son has an activity in Warrenton the same time as her daughter’s dance class. Illemszky is asking for a $143 refund.
“It’s not big bananas to us,” she said, “but there’s a lot of us that are owed between $15 and $200. It adds up. … We were good customers. We knew them very well. I had no explanation and no response.”
Illemszky said she left multiple phone messages and e-mails for Erwin-Fitz before demanding a refund. She said she mailed a certified letter to Erwin-Fitz’s home Feb. 18. On Tuesday, Illemszky said, she received the letter back from the post office with a stamp that said the recipient had refused it.
In response to inquiries about refunds, Erwin-Fitz said In Motion management was reviewing the accounts on a case-by-case basis.
“That takes time,” she said. “There are people who are demanding money who owed money. There are people demanding money for services that have been rendered. There have been refund checks for those accounts that have been reviewed. It’s not going to happen overnight.”
Erwin-Fitz said the staff is reviewing policies along with individual accounts to determine who is eligible for a refund, but stressed that the audits take time. She did not know how many accounts In Motion holds.
The building
Although In Motion told parents that the Warrenton building was officially closed and anyone on the premises would be considered trespassing, Illemszky said she saw a baseball team practicing inside last week.
Leading up to the e-mail Feb. 10, Illemszky said, she suspected something was afoot; the Warrenton location’s costume boutique held a sale and was empty the next week, and piano classes ceased at the studio after staff got rid of the in-house piano.
“It’s just all very curious and strange,” she said.
Members of In Motion Sports received a similar e-mail from Erwin-Fitz’s husband and business partner, David, in regard to the facility closing. The Star-Exponent received a copy of the e-mail, which said all participants would receive a refund.
The Star-Exponent tried contacting building officials with the town of Warrenton to inquire about the building’s owner, but they could not be reached for comment.
“We invested a lot of time, energy and money into making the building safe,” Erwin-Fitz said, “and there were still many issues with the building, but we could not come to terms with the owner to our satisfaction.”
She said that a week before closing, three inches of water covered the floor in a 50-foot area from an ice storm, and sprinklers on the rear of the building had burst. When asked about the baseball team practicing, she said she was not aware of its presence in the building after its closing.
“I do not know anything about that,” she said. “I don’t know. That’s not part of us. We did have baseball teams there, but I’m not quite sure why they would have been there then.”
When pressed about the other ongoing issues, she did not give more information.
“There were some issues with the building,” she said. “I can’t be any more specific. … To me, it’s very surreal. It’s really hard to explain; it happened very fast and very quickly. I haven’t had a chance to catch my breath.
“It’s certainly something that was not planned by the management at all. It’s just so unfortunate that the community has lost this. It’s definitely a labor of love for anybody who worked there.”
The Culpeper studio
Erwin-Fitz said the Warrenton and Culpeper studios were separate entities, with members and managers rather than an owner. She is the director until “things change over” but did not know when that would be.
Culpeper resident Janna Coppage is the day-to-day manager of Piedmont In Motion operations at 128 W. Culpeper St., the address to which Erwin-Fitz transferred all dance classes from Warrenton.
The Culpeper studio has been in operation since 2004.
Coppage, who also teaches a handful of classes, stressed that although the same board ran both entities, the two had separate bank accounts and management.
“I just want to make it clear that Culpeper and Warrenton are two different things,” she said. “The way we do things is completely different. Every time I went to Warrenton, it was just a negative atmosphere. I’ve busted my butt to make sure things are different.”
The Culpeper studio recently expanded, and Coppage saw the consolidation as a good thing for Culpeper, tripling the number of classes offered.
“It’s a great opportunity for us to expand,” Coppage said. “I would like to extend the invitation to these people that they come and see the new studio.”
In response to parents’ complaints, Coppage said refunds were not “out of the question.” She said there were more than 60 accounts to review, and In Motion had been inundated with angry e-mails.
“It’s gotten really ugly over something that doesn’t need to be,” she said. “You don’t get a refund in five minutes. As they come in, they’re being reviewed.”
Being a nonprofit, Coppage said they had to “go through the proper channels” to issue refunds.
The Culpeper studio will continue to offer dance classes on its regular schedule. Classes range from tap to ballet to hip hop and jazz for young children and teens.
What is In Motion?
In Motion Dance Center
128 West Culpeper St., Suite 200
Call 829-2439 or visit piedmontinmotion.org
Piedmont In Motion is a nonprofit corporation based in Culpeper, under which In Motion Dance Center (in Culpeper) operates. Its purpose is “to provide performance opportunities and to promote year-round physical fitness for all children and adults” in the area, according to its Web site, PiedmontInMotion.org.
In Motion Sports and Dance formerly operated in Warrenton and was the “sister” business to Piedmont In Motion, though it was a for-profit enterprise. Both were separate entities run by managing director Terri Erwin-Fitz and a common board of directors. Fitz and a management team still oversee operations after the Warrenton facility closed, though Janna Coppage manages the day-to-day operations in Culpeper.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I’m beginning to think this In Motion business is all a big con game. March 13 - more than a month after their closing and no refunds to me or at least 3 other people I know.
Their “sudden” decision to close (and the apparent cause of such stress for poor, little, innocent Terri) seemed very well planned to those of us handing over money while watching them sell the piano and close the upstairs studio the last week of January, clear out the botique, close the office on Feb 2…let’s just say by Feb 9 when they cancelled classes it wasn’t a shock. What was a shock was that they had the nerve to say we wren’t getting any money back.
In my short 3 months dealing with Terri, I paid every single deposit, fee, tuition payment on time and in full - and I’m thanked by this?
About Terri & Jana’s statment that they are reviewing accounts and this takes time - after they slunk out of town with our money, it was several days of phone calls and emails before Jana called back (have never heard from or seen Terri, the dedicated owner, not once) - to say that she was speaking on behalf of Terri and accepting our cancellation and we were forfeiting tuition and costume fees, which are non-refundable. Not cancelling, I said, you’re out of business. Her response was very close to “You’re not getting any money back. Have your lawyer contact us if you like.“ That’s good management at a fantastic studio? That’s reviewing accounts? That’s separate management? That’s customers getting ugly over something that doesn’t need to be?
After this article, they did actually review some accounts (at least of the people who ticked them off by talking to the media) - and came to the conclusion that I owe THEM money. LOVE IT! They go out of business, refuse to pay money for services they aren’t going to deliver, deceive their customers, and then go back to the customers who had supported them to demand more money. And they made up fake billing statements with obviously incorrect entries to come to this new “amount due.“
Separate management, say Terri & Jana? Their rationale for not giving money back was that we had signed up to do business with “In Motion” - be it Culpeper or Warrenton - and they were still in business in Culpeper. That doesn’t sound too separate. Now, though, they say “Piedmont in Motion, LLC” is taking over the accounts of IN Motion Dance Center, LLC (which was voluntarily cancelled by Terri with the State Corporation Commission on 2/5). Can you really just take people’s money and when it’s not working out change names, move to a new location, and take more money? Especially for a non-profit (which they claim to be) - is this an acceptable business model?
It’s all just so unbelievable. Terri Fitz-Erwin and her staff - whatever name they are operating under - are, at best, dishonest, immoral business people who don’t care at all about their customers. And she is spending so much time dodging her past customers, making up fake billing statements, and fighting tooth and nail to keep the little bit of money she fraudulently took from me and others - makes me wonder how bad financially the business is doing, and how she has any time or energy left to concentrate on her culpeper business or actually teaching dance.
I intend to keep after her until I get my money back, and would caution anyone who is doing any business with Terri or any of her many ever-changing businesses to think very carefully about all this information.
Terri Erwin Fitz plays a wonderful “damsel in distress.“ Are we to believe this mess was all the fault of the Warrenton facility building’s owner? It was Terri, her husband, and the mysterious “board” that decided to move the school to the warehouse building from its well established home on West Lee Street, so it is their fault and responsibility, and no one elses!
I also am appalled at Terri’s response of “these things take time!“ to her client’s request for refund. Ummm, WHAT??!! Give me a break! Team Erwin Fitz, really need to take responsibility for their poor business decisions and hire some REAL professionals to clean up their horrid mess! Did these people not even attempt to write a business plan or consult anyone about any of their plans or ideas? I mean any two year old could have taken one look at that building they moved into and advised them against it!!! But instead they forged ahead, citing a warm fusion of sports and arts, in the largest facility in Warrenton! They talked the talk, but they sure could not, and did not deliver.
Here is the truth: since the Erwin-Fitz Crew bought In Motion from the reputable Laura Crowne in 2003/2004, it seems they have only succeeded in destroying the pre-existing business and burning many bridges. In the “new” warehouse facility, all the boys on their way to sports practice would stop and gawk at all the young ladies in leotards & tights. There were 16 year olds in management positions and teaching advanced classes! There were no doors on the dance studios! There was exposed drywall framing and unpainted drywall! There were pools of stagnant water that were breeding grounds for mosquitoes! The ceiling would leak EVERYTIME it rained! There was a handicapped bathroom that NEVER worked! There were sharp objects everywhere, not to mention the clutter, clutter, clutter and the filth, filth, filth! In short, the whole place was a disgrace.
I did not feel that the set-up was ever safe or appropriate, and I never felt it ever would be. Clearly the county agreed, and I applaud them! BRAVO! BRAVO! BRAVO!
FINAL WORDS OF CAUTION TO PARENTS: If Terri, her husband, and the mysterious “board,“ are going to have anything AT ALL to do with the Culpeper studio, it might be time to look at classes elsewhere! It is ridiculous to think you might have to get a lawyer involved just because you signed your kid up for some dance classes! If you do choose to dance here, read the fine print to your so-called “contact” EXTREMELY carefully, especially since it seems Terri’s breach of contract threats are her MO. In fact, check out the wikipedia page on “breach of contract.“ I am no lawyer, but it seems to me that In Motion is the party in breach, certainly not the clients! Can someone say “CLASS ACTION SUIT?“ Just sayin…
I am surprised that they have stayed in business for this long! I wish you all great success in receiving your refunds. The Erwin-Fitz Team are experts at making promises, not fulfilling those promises then backing each other up in a merry-go-round of excuses and postponements which result in no reimbursement at all! This has been true for the last 4 years at least!
We have all wondered what they do with their income because they still owe their teachers for back wages and production materials.
Best wishes to you all.
It is about time Terri Erwin Fitz takes responsibility for her cheating parents out of money and ruining little girls desire to dance. Four years ago she stole money from our family by refusuing to give a refund when her instructor was found to be unqualified and routinely absent from my daughter’s dance class.She refused to refund our money for the class or the shoes she “required” at a 50% markup sold only in her “Boutique.“ I knew eventually she would cross the line with other parents as you cannot just mistreat people and not have karma come back to get ya.My conversation with her and her “partner” were pathetic. She claims she made no money- yeah right! I even contemplated ordering magnetic car signs that said “In Motion Dance Studio Sucks!“


Advertisement