Obama speech to students sparks new controversy
Published: September 4, 2009
DALLAS — When kids all across the country return to school Tuesday, some will see a welcoming message from Presi-dent Barack Obama and some won’t.
Obama’s planned address to students has touched off yet another confrontation with Re-publican critics, who have bat-tered the White House over health care and now accuse the president of foisting a political agenda on children.
The president will speak diectly to students Tuesday about the need to work hard and stay in school. His address will be shown live on the White House Web site and on C-SPAN at noon EDT, a time when classrooms across the country will be able to tune in.
Schools don’t have to show it. But districts across the country have been inundated with phone calls from parents and are struggling to address the controversy that broke out after Education Secretary Arne Duncan sent a letter to principals urging schools to tune in.
According to Culpeper County Public Schools spokeswoman Pearl Jamison, the local decision to air President Obama’s speech will be left up to each school’s principal.
If CCPS principals decide to air the speech, parents can opt their child out of the viewing, Jamison said.
Districts in states including Texas, Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri, Virginia and Wisconsin have decided not to show the speech to students. Others are still thinking it over or are letting parents have their kids opt out.
Some conservatives, driven by radio pundits and bloggers, are urging schools and parents to boycott the address. They say Obama is using the opportunity to promote a political agenda and is overstepping the boundaries of federal involvement in schools.
``As far as I am concerned, this is not civics education — it gives the appearance of creating a cult of personality,‘’ said Oklahoma Republican state Sen. Steve Russell. ``This is something you’d expect to see in North Korea or in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq.‘’
Arizona state schools superintendent Tom Horne, a Republican, said lesson plans for teachers created by Obama’s Education Department ``call for a worshipful rather than critical approach.‘’
The White House plans to release the speech online Monday so parents can read it. The president will deliver the speech at Wakefield High School in Arlington, Va.
``I think it’s really unfortunate that politics has been brought into this,‘’ White House deputy policy director Heather Higginbottom said in an interview with The Associated Press.
``It’s simply a plea to students to really take their learning seriously. Find out what they’re good at. Set goals. And take the school year seriously.‘’
She noted that President George H.W. Bush made a similar address to schools in 1991. Like Obama, Bush drew criti-cism, with Democrats accusing the Republican president of ma-ing the event into a campaign commercial.
Critics are particularly upset about lesson plans the administration created to accompany the speech. The lesson plans, available online, originally recommended having students ``write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president.‘’
The White House revised the plans Wednesday to say students could ``write letters to themselves about how they can achieve their short-term and long-term education goals.‘’
``That was inartfully worded, and we corrected it,‘’ Higginbot-tom said.
In the Dallas suburb of Plano, Texas, the 54,000-student school district is not showing the 15- to 20-minute address but will make the video available later.
PTA council president Cara Mendelsohn said Obama is ``cut-ting out the parent’‘ by speaking to kids during school hours.
``Why can’t a parent be watching this with their kid in the evening?‘’ Mendelsohn said. ``Because that’s what makes a powerful statement, when a parent is sitting there saying, ‘This is what I dream for you. This is what I want you to achieve.‘’‘
Texas Gov. Rick Perry, a Republican, said in an interview with the AP that he’s ``certainly not going to advise anybody not to send their kids to school that day.‘’
``Hearing the president speak is always a memorable moment,‘’ he said.
But he also said he understood where the criticism was coming from.
``Nobody seems to know what he’s going to be talking about,‘’ Perry said. ``Why didn’t he spend more time talking to the local districts and superintendents, at least give them a heads-up about it?‘’
Several other Texas districts have decided not to show the speech, although the district in Houston is leaving the decision up to individual school princi-pals. In suburban Houston, the Cypress-Fairbanks district planned to show the address and has had its social studies teach-ers assemble a curriculum and activities for students.
In Wisconsin, the Green Bay school district decided not to show the speech live and to let teachers decide individually whether to show it later.
Florida GOP chairman Jim Greer said in a statement he was ``absolutely appalled that tax-payer dollars are being used to spread President Obama’s social-ist ideology.‘’ Despite his rhetoric, two of the larger Florida districts, Miami-Dade and Hills-borough, plan to have classes watch the speech. Students whose parents object will not have to watch.
The Minnesota Association of School Administrators is recom-mending against disrupting the first day of school to show the speech, but Minnesota’s biggest teachers’ union is urging schools to show it.
Quincy, Ill., schools decided Thursday not to show the speech. Superintendent Lonny Lemon said phone calls ``hit like a load of bricks’‘ on Wednesday.
One Idaho school superinten-dent, Murray Dalgleish of Coun-cil, urged people not to rush to judgment.
``Is the president dictating to these kids? I don’t think so,‘’ Dalgleish said. ``He’s trying to get out the same message we’re trying to get out, which is, `You are in charge of your education.‘’‘
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I can’t believe the short sighted arguments on the President’s address to school students. What are we discussing here? Some of the babbeling here smacks of “idiot radio”.... you know what I’m talking about. Limbaugh and his clones who will say anything controversal, which equals listeners, which means a fatter paycheck to them and there are people who believe them as preaching the gospel. So since those fools say so we now call the President a commie and equate him to Kim of North Korea. All for what? Because he wants to encourage kids to do well in school. Some people need to get a life if you have nothing better to do than create a mountain out of a molehill. The President wouldn’t need to address students if parents did a better job making sure their kids did what was expected in the learning envoronment in the first place.
BTW…My first employer was a Bircher. ELD… YOu only had it one day a year. I listened to that GARBAGE EVERY day for many years. Fortunately I KNEW it was garbage and just didn’t listen.
ELD….LOL…Poor Poland always catches it first, don’t they?
haha, waddy gor pwned (owned for the less savvy).
From the perspective of someone a bit older, it suggests schools may have backed off some on political indoctrination since the late 50s and early 60s. Back in those “good old days,“ every middle school/high school kid in my city (including those attending private schools) was required to attend a day long assembly to listen to the paranoid rantings of the John Birch Society. Our biology books didn’t say much about evolution, but claimed it a scientific fact that marijuana (which none of us had ever seen) caused heroin addiction. The country was getting sucked into the Viet Nam quagmire, but we never heard about it. Some of us nevertheless survived.
In his original unedited speech, the President was going to whip the third graders into a patriotic frenzy, then have them invade Poland.
sreyno12….very well said…much ado about nothing.
whip-e-ding. as one of the earlier posters said that its not like students haven’t heard this before from parents and teachers. At least the president is trying to care about the future state of this nation. he could just as easily say “yay! hooray for marijuana!“ but hes not. Stop getting worked up over nothing cause this is sad that we consider our president to be trying to brain wash our children by wishing them success and instilling a work ethic.
RE: Channel One. Some parents probably never heard of it because (a) not every middle school uses it; (b) the students do not pay attention to it. Basically it’s a morning news feed, slightly MTV’ized to foster them to pay attention more. But ... it’s news, and 12-13 yr. olds do not care.
Secondly, obviously locadad prefers that all brainwashing be done at home, where it should be done. D**n those commie, pinko teachers who ARE ALL LIBERAL, SOFT-HEARTED PANTY WAISTS.
Owh, wait, that’s not true. Some of my best friends are conservative, patriots who just happen to be teachers. Some are libertarian. Others are (surprise) yellow dog democrats. All of them have one thing in common - they do not bring up their personal politics while teaching students.
And the OFFICE of the president - IMHO - is being attacked in all this rhetoric against a simple speech which is now available to the public.
Local- I guess you’re figuring that kids will come home and say something nice about Obama and then the parents will beat them up. Yea, I’m concerned about that too. Or are you concerned that they will come home and say something nice about Obama and the parents will become Democrats. If that’s all it takes, I think someone would have tried it before.
But they hear try hard in school from parents, teachers, etc. for years. What so wrong with a more high profile person doing it that maybe will get through to them in a way that the teachers, parents can’t.
Anyone who keeps their kids away from school tomorrow isn’t too serious about education.
Back to Channel One. The last I heard Culp. schools still used it. It is used for middle school in Culp. It is in about 200 middle and high schools in VA. I once made a map of where it is used and virtually all are in the poorest sections of the state- SW and Southside.
C1 provide the TVs. The programming contains 2 min. of ads plus other quasi ads. 13 minutes may not sound like a lot of time but it amounts to the equivalent of a week of school and a day of watching commercials.
I encouraged Madison to drop it a couple of years ago and thankfully they did. I wrote a column about it a year ago but it’s apparently still in both culp. middle schools. This is a lot more of a problem than an ed pep talk by the pres. on 1 DAY.
The federal govt. provides about 5% of most school’s budget. Amazing that they get to wield so much power via their nclb.
Someone point me to the paragraph on death panels
Jesus is dead? I heard somewhere that Michael Jackson died, but Jesus, really?
I am curious what localdad consisers a proper venue though
I can’t help but wonder if those who “want the federal government out of education” would be willing to pay half-and-again as much in taxes to do so. Remember, Virginia is a recipient state in the federal tax structure.
Given the state’s existing tax code, the likely outcome would be an even stronger shift in favor of local funding on education. Then, when children from economically depressed areas failed to do well, there’d be a flood of people insisting that people just needed to lift themselves up by their bootstraps.


Advertisement