Embarrassing affairs can quickly ruin the best politician’s career
Published: October 8, 2009
You know, subjects of a political nature just “ain’t my bag, baby.” However, in the case of various politicians and their personal indiscretions, I must make an exception.
» EDWARDS: Most recently, there has been chatter about John Edwards’ mistress, Rielle Hunter, and the allegations that her 14-month-old child is, in fact, John Edwards’ offspring.
There is further speculation that Mr. Edwards promised Hunter the world — of course, only after his wife passed away from her terminal cancer.
Is the latter true? One can only hope not.
Edwards’ revelation of the affair was followed by his dropping out of the presidential race for 2008, only after allegedly misusing campaign funds to cover up the affair. I cannot imagine how his wife, Elizabeth Edwards (terminally ill in Stage 4 of breast cancer, which has metastasized to her bones and other organs) felt when she found out the news of the affair.
» SPITZER: After only 14 months in office, Gov. Eliot Spitzer resigned after The New York Times revealed he spent time with a $1,000-per-hour prostitute. It’s believed that Spitzer spent as much as $80,000 on prostitutes — and, surprise, he allegedly spent campaign funds for at least part of these purchases!
Prosecutors later dropped the criminal charges, stating there was no evidence of misuse of public monies.
» BILL CLINTON: Perhaps the most publicized liaisons are those of the president. I can recall Bill Clinton saying, with a pointed finger, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.”
Well, it depends on what your definition of “sexual relations” is.
I won’t go into graphic detail, but his definition was akin to splitting hairs.
» THE KENNEDYS: John F. Kennedy’s affair with Marilyn Monroe was perhaps the best known presidential rendezvous, complete with Marilyn in a skin-tight dress breathily singing, “Happy Birthday, Mr. President.”
JFK’s brother Ted was no stranger to scandal either. His now-infamous accident at Chappaquiddick Island put him on the map.
In 1969, Kennedy attended a party there, leaving with a young lady named Mary Jo Kopechne. Kennedy’s car veered off a bridge and into a pond. Kennedy was able to escape the car, and attempted to pull Kopechne out, to no avail. He waited until the next day and only called Kopechne’s parents after he called his lawyer. Ted Kennedy received only a two-month suspended sentence for leaving the scene of a crime.
» GINGRICH: Oh, and I would be remiss if I didn’t mention holier-than-thou Newt Gingrich, who served his first wife with divorce papers while she was in the hospital, battling cancer. Newt gave his second wife the heave-ho on Mother’s Day, over the phone, even, after learning she had Multiple Sclerosis.
Watch out for karma, Newt.
Did I mention that he was carrying on an extramarital affair while in the midst of damning President Clinton for his indiscretions? Yes, Mister Honesty & Ethics – judge not, lest ye be judged.
It truly amazes and disgusts me that politicians — in their positions to represent us, the citizens of the United States of America — are always pointing their finger at some “evil-doer” when they should be pointing the finger at themselves.
Smith’s column runs every Friday on the editorial page.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
Absolutely, no dispute..BTW…Nowhere did I say that you lionized TK..If you thought that, by my remark I was implying this, you were off the mark. You must, however, admit that he has been lionized by many and this was the implication. sorry if you took it the wrong way.
Good grief Rogersk, where do you get the idea I am lionizing him. I think his actions that night were deplorable. By the way, I was 10 miles away that night. I know the area well.
But all that is completely beside the point. To imply, (and whoever wrote the headline sure thought that the writer was saying that they were all affairs) that TK was having an affair with this woman is not supported by the facts. Writers, even opinion writers, should not imply that.
Any dispute with that?
As an addendum to my previous comment…when one chooses to be in the public eye, in ANY capacity he/she must also expect public scrutiny, whether factual, partially factual, or untrue. This goes along with it, especially in politics. One must have very broad shoulders.
What does the COD have to do with this? Everyone dies of something..Believe me, when I say I had the deepest sympathy for Senator Kennedy and his family. It is s terrible disease for anyone to have to endure but that doesn’t change anything. There are millions of cancer sufferers. Some of these people (probably most) are good, some not good. Cancer is an equal opportunity disease. I don’t believe TK should be lionized because he had this awful thing.
Of course, columnists are entitled to their own opinions. They’re just not entitled to their own facts. This column only gave examples of extramarital affairs. There is no evidence that TK was having an affair with Ms. Kopechne but it sure is implied that there was one and the headline which may or may not been written by Hope only adds to that impression. One would think that Hope would treat another cancer sufferer (one who succumbed) more fairly than that.
And Jerry, if you think I sling mud, and you are surely entitled to your opinion, then maybe you could provide an example of that since you apparently believe it is so common. I wrote a column about the Gov. race yesterday and nary a comment. I guess no one had any dispute with it. Where’s the mud?
I’m curious…does death confer on us, sainthood? It doesn’t matter whether, or not, Ted Kennedy had an affair with Miss Kopechne. It does matter, however, that he waited hours before getting help and had to confer with his attorney even before that. Sounds very suspect to me. True, he did work hard in the congress for the poor of this country, but why wouldn’t he? That was his job. He was not and is not a saint. He was a human being with human foibles and was far from perfect, not just for the Kopechne incident. Some might even term him a “player”. Everyone understand, this is a bipartisan remark.
Hi Hope, prior to the article that you have just written, your articles were like a “breath of fresh air” in the media business. What you have said in this article probably needs to have been said, however, in my opinion, this type of mud slinging is best left to people such as Mr. Legge. I believe you are on a higher
plain and all of your previous articles tend to bring out the best in people. Please go back to what you do best, i.e., continue to write words that touch and enrich people lives. Jerry R. Beckett
Cannot Hope express her thoughts and opinions just as Mr. Legge, Mr. Sharman, and all columnists express theirs? Isn’t that what a column is all about? Whether, or not, we agree with what she writes it is her right to express her ideas. Most of us disagree with the columnists from time to time but I find Hope’s columns to be the one I turn to first in CSE. The content and ideas presented hold my attention and are not “preachy” as some of the other columns are.
Hi Hope, prior to this article I have considered you like a “breath of fresh air” in the media business. Your previous articles brought out the best in people. I know the things you have said in this article, probably need to have been said, however,in my opinion, the mud slinging articles can best be left to people such as Mr. Legge. I consider you to be on a higher plain and believe that is what you do best, i.e., you articles have meaning and substance that we the readers can relate to. There is enough hate to be read so please go back to your true gift, and that is touching people lives with your words. Jerry R. Beckett
You know, Obama is just like Clinton. But this time around Monica Lewinsky is ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC & CNN.


Advertisement