HOW I SEE IT: Math doesn’t add up on State Theatre
Published: November 5, 2009
A short while back I had published in this newspaper my concerns regarding the nonsensical loan being made to the State Theatre Foundation for continued restoration.
After that letter, I forwarded to all of our Town Council members and our mayor a more in-depth explanation of my concerns. As a result, I have received one response from our mayor and several responses from Councilman Chris Snider.
The mayor abruptly informed me that my “facts and assumptions” were wrong, as I did not have all of the details. He advised me that this matter did not need to be “reconsidered,” as he and the council were reviewing the matter currently.
Mr. Snider was concerned with my assertion that it could take better than 30 years to repay this loan. I sent him an amortization schedule proving that a loan of $1.5 million at 6-percent interest over 30 years would make for a $9,000-per-month loan payment. Add insurance and taxes on top of that.
Mr. Snider advised me that should the State Theatre sell out all 533 seats at a price of $50 apiece, the revenue for that show would be $26,650.
Here is the problem with his math: The theater will not sell every seat for $50, and will in fact have many free and discounted seats to whatever performance is scheduled. Deduct from that revenue the cost of the performers. That will vary from a low of $70,000 to a high of many thousands of dollars. Some touring companies prefer to work on a split-of-the-ticket revenue each night. There is no way to calculate that amount at this time.
Plug in the huge amount of money that will need to be spent to advertise the event, plus the staff payroll. Now add in the day-to-day operating costs. As I told the mayor and Town Council, this project cannot secure private financing because there is never going to be a “return on investment.”
Figure that a full house of 533 patrons will show up and that three people each share a car. That means there will be 177 cars that will have nowhere to park downtown. Couple this with a weekend night, and add the cars that patronize Regal Cinemas. Who will pay for the extra police patrols that will be necessary to enforce traffic and parking?
You guessed it: you and me!
There are performing arts centers in Manassas, Warrenton, Fredericksburg and Charlottesville that are suffering hardships due to the economy. This is not a “Field of Dreams” moment for Culpeper. Why are we not allowed to vote on this through a referendum or ballot initiative? That is the only fair way for all citizens to be heard.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
I doubt we’ll see a public referendum on this issue anytime soon - too much risk that the voters might turn it down, just as they did in the recent CSE poll. As long as we have people with a “bread and circuses” mentality running our town government, our taxes will continue to be used as if it were THEIR money instead of OURS. How else could such ridiculous ideas as a community pool even get on the board? And now a loan that (wink-wink) isn’t really a loan, to open a theatre that, as far as I’ve observed, no one has any idea how to run, just lots of pie in the sky about how great it would be. Well, it would be great if it could happen the way the starry-eyed seem to think it would - but that’s still not the purview of a responsible government.
Thank you Mr. McMasters for laying out this information. Now that the council seems determined to vote for it while giving the appearance of “considering” it, we should all be paying close attention to who’s pulling whose strings.
Good article David, however, you must understand what you are dealing with. The Mayor has spent millions on studies to build a police station and the monies spent could have easily built three police stations. His biggest accomplishment has been the side walks and bike paths and with the new “Fat Tax” he can expand them even further and lets not forget his stance on illegal aliens. Culpeper can now boast it is now one of the smallest 10 towns that provides sanctuary for illegal aliens. With no jobs or incomes, how do you think they are subsisting, especially during the winter months? You may want to direct that question to Mr. Coleman. Mr. Snider personally told me that my taxes would double if the county and town consolidated and when I asked why, he replied because of “PERSONALITIES”, also remember, he signed the petition for consolidation but OPPS, he didn’t read it. Mr. DuFrane mentality is “we have been doing it this way for fifty years and we are not going to change it”. Mr. Coleman is just a “chip off the old block” who enjoys his councilship as a hobby and it appears he is going to up his hobby to the mayoralship. With two members on the board of supervisors, one member on the school board and who knows whoever else working for him as the director of social services, more than likely, he will prevail. Mike is still in the “follower” mold, but I hope he will break out as a leader. It appears that only Bobby Ryan is an independent thinker. Oh well, you get what you pay for, opps, I mean what you vote for. Lastly, what happened to the the new “NOISE LAW” being implemented. Has the Mayor initiated a study? Are we consulting Mr. Glass at $342.00 per hour on this critical issue? Can Mr. Bendall our town attorney handle this one by himself? Are the voters of Culpeper ready to “topple” their little kingdom? The problem with having to many big fish in a little pond, once they eat the little fish, the big fish start feeding on themselves. I guess we will have to stay tuned until May to find out the answers. Of course, all of the above is just my opinion, however, as the Mayor has said in the past that Mr. Beckett is wrong on everything. Jerry R. Beckett
Post a Comment(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Flag Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.


Advertisement