Pray for fair weather, and the freedom to make wrong decisions
Published: December 1, 2009
Updated: December 1, 2009
Francis Bacon, a 17th-century English judge, scientist, author and philosopher, said, “When any of the four pillars of government: religion, justice, counsel, and treasure, are mainly shaken or weakened, men had need to pray for fair weather.”
Every year at Christmas time, in Nativity plays across the nation, children recite to us the Bible verse that identifies Jesus Christ as the pillar of religion supporting government: “For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder.” (Isaiah 9:6)
We, as citizens, must individually give Christ this right to govern us, otherwise, as another major influence on our nation’s designers, Edmund Burke, said: “Among a people generally corrupt, liberty
cannot long exist.”
The reason for that is simple: unless we freely accept the structure proposed for our lives by God, we will always be resting on a support that can never be as insightful, effective or as strong as the
one created by God, our Father.
Many citizens no longer have this internal pillar of spiritual government in their lives, and so we have recently been experiencing many legislative expressions of our choice as a society to exchange our historic celebration of individual liberty for the apparent security of governmental benefits for the majority.
In the past we have described other nations which have made that exchange as fascist, communist, socialist or Nazi.
The word “fascist” means “bundle, group, assemblage” and was chosen by Benito Mussolini for the name of his World War II-era Italian dictatorship that created a merger of state and industry.
A “socialist” nation is one in which the government owns or controls the means of production and distribution of good and resources. “Nazi” was simply the German phonetic shortening of the term National-sozialist, for the National Socialist German Workers’ Party.
In Marxist theory, socialism is a transitional phase from capitalism (private people own and control private property) to communism (there is no such thing as private property).
Inherent in each of those political ideologies is the idea that the will of the state and the collective good of the majority is of more value than the freedoms of the individuals within that society.
In George Orwell’s novel “Animal Farm: A fairy story,” the leader of Animal Farm — the boar Comrade Napoleon — begins to incrementally remove the barnyard citizens’ freedoms in order to gain more power for himself. Squealer, the public relations pig for Napoleon, tries to placate the animals:
“Comrades,” he said, “I trust that every animal here appreciates the sacrifice that Comrade Napoleon has made in taking this extra labour upon himself. Do not imagine, comrades, that leadership is a pleasure! On the contrary, it is a deep and heavy responsibility. No one believes more firmly than Comrade Napoleon that all animals are equal. He would be only too happy to let you make your decisions for yourselves. But sometimes you might make the wrong decisions, comrades, and then where should we be?”
If we have lost the freedom to fail, then we have also lost the freedom to truly succeed.
Such an enormous loss as that shakes our national foundation and weakens our nation’s core belief that we are all individually endowed by our mutual Creator, with certain unalienable personal rights, among them being life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Pray for fair weather ahead.
Sharman’s column appears each Tuesday.
Advertisement
Reader Reactions
True ELD, but did you ever explore where those morals came from that a moral person has? Where is its origins?
A moral person does not have to be a Christian to know the right things to do. We need those people in office and not self proclaimed Christians and other immoral people hiding behind a moral disguise.
OW, I think you are the sort of christian Jesus will recognize when the book of life is opened.
I also think Mr. Sharman, while at times inspirational, has a poor grasp of political science.
There is so much codswallop packed into this short column that it isn’t possible to address all the issues raised in a single post. Indeed, the thought of spending any amount of time in this amount of intellectual ordure gives one pause.
Still, the beautiful lotus flower blooms in the mud of the swamp, and there may be some benefit to those whose minds are still open of looking more closely of some of what is said here.
As it is late and I am tired, I will wait for another day to address the issues, but will raise the first of many questions raised by this unabashedly evangelical tract.
What difference does it make what Francis Bacon did or didn’t say? What relevance is there to what groups of children are taught by their parents to parrot? What does Isaiah have to do with Jesus?
There are others, but those give us a starting point.
True believers should ignore further posts from me. I’m not going to change your minds, and I’ll just upset you.
rjma, I can answer your question. It is incitement of resistance to, or insurrection against, lawful authority…sedition. It begins with the assertion that “religion” is a “pillar” of government. It is not. From the start, religion has had no place in American government. Although raised a Christian, I have never heard any children recite Isaiah 9:6 (a book of the Old Testament) at Christmas time or at any other. I strongly disagree that “we” (American citizens) “must” give Christ (or any other deity) the “right” to “govern” anybody. Our forefathers too rejected that idea. Our Constitution forbids it. If we did, our concept of liberty would be gone. Edmund Burke (1703-97) bequeathed no straightforward legacy to any political party or to any ideological brand of thought, though plenty have tried (like Sharman) to appropriate him wholly or partly. Our founders created a form of government contradicting Burke’s and Sharman’s notions. Many if not most consider ours as the best form of government ever. That our government rejects the notion that religion has any place in it has not proven that concept to be “corrupt” or short lived. No one in this country has “lost” the freedom to fail or to succeed. Our “national foundation” has not been “shaken” and “we are all individually endowed by our Creator, (not our “mutual” Creator) with certain unalienable personal rights, among them being life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
OrdinaryWoman, you are right. And religion, as believed in, preached and practiced by mankind, has made many horrific mistakes.
Waddy, it appears to me that Sharman agrees with what you wrote.
I don’t know about the freedom to make the wrong decisions, but I know that as humans, we all do make mistakes. Whether we are the President, or just an ordinary woman.
rjma, I think he is trying to say that it is ok to let a bank fail, a big business fail, or even us, as individuals fail. Then, we get back up and start riding horses again.
There will never be a perfect man-made government, never has, never will. The closest we can come to governing a body of people in fairness with good moral behaviors such as honesty, is to model ours after that which God designed, and showed us through His Son, Jesus.
Thankfully, throughout the Bible, we can see that God used a little of each of the above. As there are times, that we don’t know what is best for us, and we have to be made to do it, (i.e. give up slavery), and there are times that we need to run our own production and businesses, yet do to corruption, also need policing or regulations.
There are times we need to work together to accomplish a common goal, such as protection, general health and welfare…
I think the hard thing to find is a good and godly mix, which only comes with wisdom, like many of those quoted in the above article.
I can answer that. Concepts such as Don’t Lie, Don’t Steal, Don’t Cheat, Personal Liberty and Responsibility have NO place in 21st century America.
Can someone explain what this has to do with 21st century America?


Advertisement