The first week of June 2009: Seven days that threaten to change history

» 93 Comments | Post a Comment

Perhaps historians will say that American life changed in the first week of June 2009.

In the summers of 1981 and 1982, Timothy F. Geithner was a student at Peking University but on Monday, June 1, 2009, he was there as the U.S. Treasury Secretary “to explore our common interest in international financial reform.” 1

“China, despite your own manifest challenges as a developing country, you are in an enviably strong position,” Geithner told his audience. But for the United States, “The fallout from these events has been brutally indiscriminant, affecting those with little or no responsibility for the events that now buffet them, as well as on some who played key roles in bringing about our troubles.”

“I believe,” announced Geithner, “that a greater role for China is necessary for China, for the effectiveness of the international financial institutions themselves, and for the world economy. China is already too important to the global economy not to have a full seat at the international table, helping to define the policies that are critical to the effective functioning of the international financial system.”

According to The New York Times, China’s monthly car sales have exceeded those in the U.S. since January, 2009. 2 GM filed for bankruptcy on the same day as Geithner’s speech. 3 This helps explain why, during Geithner’s visit, GM announced on June 2nd a sale of its Hummer brand to China’s Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co. 4

The price or terms have not been released, but the Shanghai Daily noted that GM had told the bankruptcy court that Hummer’s value was around $500 million. 5

In China, the Hummer is known as “Han Ma”, the “fierce horse.” The $200,000 sales price of a Hummer in China is definitely fierce. 6

One Chinese state-run newspaper described Tengzhong’s purchase of Hummer as a “snake trying to swallow an elephant.” 7 Marketing specialist Wang Yukun described the plan as “childish”. Financial commentator Ye Tan said it was “unpromising”. 8

GM CEO Fritz Henderson explained the reason Hummer was sold to a four-year old Chinese company with no history or experience in automobile production: “The potential buyer Sichuan Tenzhong offered the best overall alternative, and we did not have [a] broad portfolio of other buyers!” 9

China Daily reports “the forces behind Tengzhong’s move may actually be Sichuan Huatong Investment Holding Co. and US-based investment bank Morgan Stanley.” 10 Citigroup was GM’s financial adviser in the Hummer sale. 11

The sale, said a Los Angeles Times columnist, “underscores China’s growing economic might at a time when U.S. industrial prowess is flagging.” 12

Back at the White House, on June 1st, President Obama proclaimed June 2009 to be Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month, stating: “At the international level, I have joined efforts at the United Nations to decriminalize homosexuality around the world. Here at home, I continue to support … enhancing hate crimes laws, supporting civil unions and Federal rights for LGBT couples, outlawing discrimination in the workplace, ensuring adoption rights, and ending the existing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy ...” 13

On Thursday, June 4th, in Cairo, Egypt, President Obama declared, “I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear.” 14

To help the Muslim world, Mr. Obama said, “On science and technology, we will launch a new fund to support technological development in Muslim-majority countries, and to help transfer ideas to the marketplace so they can create more jobs.” 15

On Friday, June 5th, the U.S. Labor Department announced that 345,000 more American jobs were lost in May, pushing the unemployment rate up to a 26-year high of 9.4 percent. 16

And that was the end of the week that changed American life.

i>
Sharman’s column appears each Tuesday on the editorial page.

1 Speech by Secretary Geithner – “The United States and China, Cooperating for Recovery and Growth,” June 1st, 2009, Peking University - Beijing, China, http://www.treas.gov/press/releases/tg152.htm
2 Goodman, Peter S., “What Would Mao Drive? A Little Red ... Hummer”,
3 “GM Files for Bankruptcy with $215 Billion Debt”, June 02, 2009
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,27574,25573322-2682,00.html
4 “Who Stands Behind Possible Buyer of Hummer?” June 05, 2009, http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/2362300/
5 “Company in Sichuan to Acquire Hummer”,  June 4, 2009
http://english.rednet.cn/c/2009/06/04/1771174.htm (Source: Shanghai Daily)
6 Pierson, David, “Chinese company buys a symbol of American affluence: But Hummer purchase makes little sense, analysts say” June 07, 2009
7 Kurtenbach, Elaine “Reports Question Chinese Hummer Acquisition” AP, Jun 5, 2009‎ http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hyv5NxsbvX7n7EbxXN4zddjXqb6AD98KE7700
8 Fangfang, Li “Hummer of a challenge for Chinese firm” China Daily June 4, 2009, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-06/04/content_8235629.htm
9 GM CEO Tackles Tough Questions on Sale of Hummer to Chinese, 06-05-2009, http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=149907
10 Fangfang, Li “Hummer of a challenge for Chinese firm” China Daily June 4, 2009, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-06/04/content_8235629.htm
11 Smith, Aaron “GM unloads Hummer to Chinese buyer: Bankrupt automaker discloses details of plan to sell truck line to China’s industrial company Sichuan Tengzhong” CNNMoney.com, June 2, 2009
http://money.cnn.com/2009/06/02/news/companies/gm_hummer/?postversion=2009060216
12 Pierson, David, “Chinese company buys a symbol of American affluence: But Hummer purchase makes little sense, analysts say” June 07, 2009
13 http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Proclamation-LGBT-Pride-Month/
14 Obama, Barack “REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON A NEW BEGINNING”, June 4, 2009, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Cairo-University-6-04-09/
15 Obama, Barack “REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON A NEW BEGINNING”, June 4, 2009, http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Remarks-by-the-President-at-Cairo-University-6-04-09/
16

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by OrdinaryWoman on June 11, 2009 at 4:50 pm

Well, I see TIPP, ROGER and as usual ELD, had nothing else to say regarding TIPP’s NOTES on the footnotes, or my rebuttal of them…and you’ve had over 5 hours to work on it…

So till next time ...  I’m off for a long weekend away.

Flag Comment Posted by OrdinaryWoman on June 11, 2009 at 4:26 pm

ELD, I am flattered once again, to have the following of your office personnel.  The fact that you quote them, and their childish analogies of me is also comical. 

So since this ‘issue’ happened in court in your minds way of thinking, a couple years ago, have you been a “stalker” of Sharman’s writings since?  That would explain your obsession and focus on him.  Have you gotten help?  Because even if it’s true, or half made up in your mind, your anger about it really needs to be dealt with, so you can move on.

Then maybe you’ll deal with current questions and articles.

Flag Comment Posted by OrdinaryWoman on June 11, 2009 at 4:06 pm

ELD, aren’t you going to prove me a liar for the truth I brought out on TIPP’s “clear and concise” proof of Sharman’s use of footnotes?  I asked you, what is the “clear and concise” truth of Tipps, as you quickly clung to, but have yet to say?  And where all the all sinister insinuating untruthful remarks in Sharman’s articles?

Or is this where you bail out again?  That’s where we’ve left off on each article, each time I ask for your provable “proof” just like you insist Sharman doesn’t give, but can’t seem to provide proof of either.  New philosophy of yours that only applies to others?

It’s quite simple really.  You say something about an article.  I challenge you on it, and then you prove me wrong.

Flag Comment Posted by El Debibble on June 11, 2009 at 2:44 pm

OW, proof of what?  You layed it all out here for everyone to see.  It’s obvious you have some issues.

Flag Comment Posted by OrdinaryWoman on June 11, 2009 at 1:47 pm

ELD, at least you dad-TIPP tries to come up with facts.  You just do your name calling and run off.

I’m still waiting on your basis for everything you say about me, with proof of course.

Flag Comment Posted by El Debibble on June 11, 2009 at 1:32 pm

OW, you can’t stand it that someone would challenge Mr. Sharman can you?  You thought you had it made and could keep on slamming out your baseless name calling without a challenge and now more people show up!!!

Your “proof” and facts are simple at best and stupid at worst.  You call everybody liars and haters and most get sick of you after a while, thus the “bowing out”.

Flag Comment Posted by OrdinaryWoman on June 11, 2009 at 1:22 pm

ELD, you can’t stand it that someone would defend Mr. Sharman can you?  You thought you had it made and could keep on slamming out your baseless name calling without a challenge.

Well, either accept your challenges, or gracefully “bow” out, like you did earlier…or move on to the next weeks’ article…which I suspect that will be exactly what you do.

Flag Comment Posted by El Debibble on June 11, 2009 at 1:19 pm

and another great quote was “If she really went to the trouble to ask people about a court case that happened several years ago and she wasn’t even invovled in it then she has the potential to be a stalker.“

Flag Comment Posted by El Debibble on June 11, 2009 at 1:17 pm

OW, feel free to show where I said what court it was in, but please don’t let it take away from your masterful defense of Sharman’s innuendo.

I am flat out saying that if you did not get an affirmation of what I said Sharman asked the lady then you either haven’t asked anyone or you didn’t ask the right people, plain and simple.  Personally I think you are lying…again.

Several people in my office have been “hooked” on the weekly Sharman bashing.  They don’t all always agree with me.  There is a consensus that Sharman doesn’t like Obama, a consensus that several of us are disgusted with Sharman, but to a person they don’t like you and it’s because of your writing style.

A great quote I just heard was “Yeah, she took it apart, but like a kid with a screwdriver she couldn’t put it back together.“

Flag Comment Posted by OrdinaryWoman on June 11, 2009 at 12:58 pm

Yes, ELD, you did tell me what court it was in.  Do you want me to find that for you?

You don’t know who I’ve talked to.  And I won’t be telling you either, so we’ll just have to be done with this topic unless you have some real tangible things to say.  Like what exactly did TIPP say that was clear and concise?  I’ve took every word of his apart and for the life of me, can’t figure out why he spent so much time on “nothing new or truthfully counter to what Sharman wrote.

If you have some, please share.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News

Advertisement