Town Council ahead of the curve with talk of traffic roundabout

» 12 Comments | Post a Comment

I’ll be the round about
The words will make you out ‘n’ out
I’ll spend the day your way ...
Call it morning driving thru the sound and
In and out the valley ...

When Jon Anderson and Steve Howe of the band Yes penned the 1970s classic “Roundabout,” they were describing a drive through the Scottish countryside. Flash forward 40 years, and a drive through Culpeper may resemble the experience — at least for one intersection.

According to Thursday’s Star-Exponent (“Roundabout concept resurfaces”), Town Council voted unanimously, and reportedly without discussion, to include a roundabout at the intersection of Route 229 and North Main Street (between Wendy’s and McDonalds) as part of the Route 229 widening project.

The vote came after John Giometti, an engineer with the Culpeper District of the Virginia Department of Transportation, informed the council that VDOT had determined a roundabout to be “a viable option” for the intersection — which could eventually include an exit to the town’s “inner loop” road connecting the area to Sperryville Pike (U.S. 522) at Virginia Avenue.

Where the idea of a roundabout on a U.S. or Virginia road may once have seemed out of place, the intersections are gaining in use because they’re safer, more efficient for traffic flow and require less maintenance.

According to the VDOT Web site, there are “at least 40 roundabouts opened to traffic and 51 planned in different stages of development” statewide (with an average of one new proposed roundabout coming up for review per week.)

“In recent years,” VDOT states, roundabouts “have been used here in the United States to reduce crashes, traffic delays, fuel consumption, air pollution and construction as well as maintenance costs, while quite often moving more traffic and enhancing intersection beauty. They have also been used to control speed in residential neighborhoods and are accepted as one of the safest types of intersection designs.”

The nonprofit Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, which is funded by insurance companies that stand to profit when claims go down, also sees the benefits: “Roundabouts, used in place of stop signs and traffic signals ... can significantly improve traffic flow and safety.”

And the IIHS also notes the added benefit of reduced gas consumption: “At 10 intersections studied in Virginia, this amounted to more than 200,000 gallons of fuel per year.”

And the Federal Highway Administration, when studying the safety record of roundabouts, found that they:

- reduce fatalities up to 90 percent
- reduce injury crashes 76 percent
- reduce pedestrian crashes 30 percent to 40 percent.

So they’re safer, more efficient and don’t require a “rocket scientist” to navigate. In fact, they require reduced speeds, which should make every driver in Culpeper better — especially those who now complain that us “slowpokes” actually going the speed limit are in their way.

Roundabouts look like a great idea just waiting for those with the insight to implement them.

I applaud Town Council for not being afraid to be ahead of the curve. A roundabout will certainly make that intersection safer (particularly for those trying to turn left from Route 229 onto Bus. 29). And years from now, we won’t question the decision as traffic flows through that area with the rhythm of a symphony orchestra.

Clements’ column runs every Monday. 

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by Oberman on October 19, 2009 at 7:50 pm

Actually here is a video of a traffic circle in use….watch the congestion….I was actually able to run from the one main corner being shown to the Arch and not get hit….kinda funny when it happened…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0v9nTw35O3w

Flag Comment Posted by Oberman on October 19, 2009 at 7:47 pm

RJMA….maybe we should put a miniature Arc de Triomphe that way it will attach tourist to come and see it.  While they are here they can go and see the State Theatre dump.

Flag Comment Posted by rogersk on October 19, 2009 at 7:04 pm

rjma…which of the greats would you suggest…Lee or Jackson??  Either would be a good choice.

Flag Comment Posted by rogersk on October 19, 2009 at 7:03 pm

rjma…which of the greats would you suggest???  Jackson or Lee?  Either would suit me.

Flag Comment Posted by Sandalwood on October 19, 2009 at 6:56 pm

Quote: “Middle of the circle would be a good place for dayworkers to hang out.“

At least the town wouldn’t have to worry about keeping the grass cut.

Flag Comment Posted by Thebreeze on October 19, 2009 at 5:57 pm

Middle of the circle would be a good place for dayworkers to hang out.

Flag Comment Posted by BuenaVista on October 19, 2009 at 5:48 pm

All that glitters is not gold…

Might be that a traffic circle is a bit too efficient for this application.  Letting southbound traffic get onto Main St. without metering might cause a big problem.

Flag Comment Posted by rjma on October 19, 2009 at 1:50 pm

and because there is that large expanse of nothing in the middle of the circle, we could erect a statue of a Confederate General.

Flag Comment Posted by Sandalwood on October 19, 2009 at 1:26 pm

They are all over Scotland and seem to work fine there.

There are even some in New England but leave it to the Yankees to call them a “rotary”. smile

Flag Comment Posted by rjma on October 19, 2009 at 10:15 am

It depends on how many lanes there are, how easy it is to navigate.  Either way, it is still a new experience for some drivers and takes some getting use to. But I they are safer, take less time and save fuel….and still work even when there is a power outage.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News

Advertisement