Was Virginia’s third-grade SOL history test really worth saving?

» 10 Comments | Post a Comment

In response to a request from school superintendents seeking ways to reduce testing requirements, the state superintendent proposed dropping the third-grade history and social sciences SOL test. The curriculum would still be taught but not tested under the proposal.

The theory was that more emphasis needed to be placed on reading and math. Ninety-three percent of students passed last year’s test, which cost $380,000 to administer. 

Surely the London-based SOL testing company Pearson was not happy. But within days, dozens of complaints came from historical parks, history advocates and state legislators.

The superintendent reacted swiftly and withdrew the proposal. While the test comprises four elements — history, economics, civics and geography — the most complaints came from history supporters, including the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Virginia Consortium of Social Studies Specialists and Virginia Historical Society.

Let’s look at the SOL standards and one of the released tests. It’s technically for grades K-3, but the test mostly only covers grades 2-3.

Grade 2 history standards are as follows: “The student will explain how the contributions of ancient China and Egypt have influenced the present world in terms of architecture, inventions, the calendar and written language.” There is another section on American Indians.

Grade 3 history standards require that students can explain the contributions and influence of Greece, Rome and Mali and describe the accomplishments of Columbus, Cartier, Newport, etc.

Sounds pretty intimidating for 6- to 8-year-olds. Not much American history, though.

OK, let’s see how we measure those rigorous standards. 

Actually, four years of history study is measured in just 10 questions, and two are about word recognition and reading comprehension; a third is more math-related. So that leaves only seven.

Question 1 from the most recently released test asks which of four Indian tribes lived in Virginia. Question 2 is about identifying Dr. King’s birthday. Three is about who used a kite in an experiment.

Four shows a graph and asks how often a president is elected. That’s the math question.

That’s it for measuring four years of American history study. No kidding — only three questions. On to ancient history.

Question 5: “Ali could see pyramids from his home. His father made papyrus.”

Answer choice: Ancient Greece, China, Egypt or Rome.

Answer: Egypt.

That sums up 5000 years of Egyptian history. 

Questions 6 and 7 are about reading comprehension and word recognition, which I’ll skip.

Question 8: An example of Greek architecture is: arch, column, dome or terraced building?  Answer: column. That covers the Greeks. Sorry, ancient China and Rome, maybe they can work you in on another test.

Questions 9 and 10 were about the 13th-century empire of Mali’s practice of storytelling and their use of salt. 

There are 10 questions on civics, such as: What should Sam do to show he takes care of his belongings? Put away his coat or sit at his desk?

Kids don’t even wear coats when they take these tests in late May, but I think that’s the answer.

The economics portion deals with arcane terms like “opportunity cost” and geography questions on whether the teacher is standing in front of or behind the desk. There are tough questions about identifying France or the Indian Ocean.

If we want kids to understand and appreciate history, start with the known and work up to the unknown. Make it relevant and age appropriate. Have it start with Virginia, not Egypt or Mali.

Some test advocates said the material won’t be taught if it isn’t tested. Sounds more like it’s taught but not tested now.

Mr. Campbell: Have you read this test? Do you really think it is that critical that we continue it?

Is this typical of how the whole SOL program is run?

Legge’s column runs every other Thursday on the editorial page.

Advertisement

 
View More: No tags are associated with this article
Not what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
 

Advertisement

Reader Reactions

Flag Comment Posted by OrdinaryWoman on July 06, 2009 at 7:27 pm

I agree with you rjma, and the other commentors.  I won’t offer any further opinion, as I believe in, pay taxes for, but I only used the public school system for 1/2 the time my children were in school and my grand-children have never used the public system, as we believe they benefit more with home schooling.  However, I feel for what the teachers and parents go through.

Flag Comment Posted by Ct Yankee on July 02, 2009 at 10:31 pm

8 year olds are way too young to be subjected to the pressure of 4 SOL tests! Mr. Legge hit the nail on the head. Do away with the Social Studies SOL test, it is irrelevant to VIRGINIA history.  Let’s focus on government and citizenship in 3rd grade and finally to keep it relevant how about in 3rd grade DUMP the sol test and require local history to be taught.  How many kids in CCPS have no clue about Culpeper history? It certainly could and should be taught!  It’s amazing to me how many children have no concept of the history that took place in their own backyard.  AYP, SOL Scores, that is the focus…. forget it…let’s get back to basics.  Keep the reading and math tests as a benchmark the rest - drop it and let’s have some relevance in the classroom.

Flag Comment Posted by KTT1649 on July 02, 2009 at 8:32 pm

rjma: I agree with you completely. However, I do dispute your theory that S.S. was taught before SOLs, it will be taught even without the test. I beg to differ. I was specifically told that we will not be teaching it since it is not an AYP or SOL subject. We spend all of the time teaching Reading and Math…and if you can manage to squeeze in 20 minutes of Science, then do so. I hate the SOLs and all it implies, but as a teacher with no voice, it’s hard to convey that to those in charge.

Flag Comment Posted by rjma on July 02, 2009 at 7:15 pm

The efficacy of the SOL is another issue in my opinion.  I was just trying to focus on this one test. 

KTT- I see no reason that just because the test was eliminated that there would be no instruction.  Schools taught social studies long before there were SOLs.  And if the principal says this is what you will teach, then it is going to get taught….same as before.

The main point I was trying to make is how much difference there is between the standards and the test.  Surely no one can conclude that if they pass the test that they know the curriculum.  After all, the standards say “EXPLAIN”.  And with multiple choice there is no option of explaining.

Flag Comment Posted by woman for obama on July 02, 2009 at 6:52 pm

I feel the pain as a teacher, and know “what else can you do” but teach to the test. I am a lowly paraeducator, formerly with CCPS, but no more.  In High School testing is run rather well, but too much hype, imho. In a middle school last year it was simply awful. We all had to wear “red” for “inspiration”, the principal was rather “bonkers” is how I would describe it…all for a test. The students were hyper, it seemed like that was all we were there for. I think Va. did us all a diservice with this test.  Teachers are way too pressured..and the kids are too.

Flag Comment Posted by KTT1649 on July 02, 2009 at 5:40 pm

As an elementary school teacher in the district, my concern is that if the SOL test disappears, so does the teaching. I am not a fan of high stakes testing by any means. I believe in a balanced assessments, using portfolios, projects, as well as tests. However, too much emphasis is placed on SOLs, especially at a young age. I have been told not to teach Social Studies since it is not one of our SOLs, nor is it AYP. Last year I taught Social Studies maybe twice a week, every month. I spent the last year teaching to the test, which I hate, but as a teacher, my hands are tied. When administration and central office direct me to teach to the test, I don’t really have a choice. It’s sad, and one of the reasons why I am looking to move out of Virginia.

Flag Comment Posted by rjma on July 02, 2009 at 5:10 pm

It shouldn’t be too much of a surprise that someone could fail a class but pass the class SOL. Passing an SOL test sometimes only requires getting half the answers right.  The most needed to pass any SOL test is around 75% which is usually a D in a regular class.

Flag Comment Posted by TobyKat on July 02, 2009 at 4:43 pm

Sorry, any time I see SOL, I see “red”. Weren’t they originally implemented to somehow assess “teacher accountability”?  So all teachers, principals, etc, talk about all year are the “tests”.  I’ve a friend who has a daughter in HS. She is failing classes, but passed her SOL’s remarkably well. The mom doesn’t know what to make of this. At parent teacher night she was assured her daugther would pass the SOLs….(History)...which she did, with flying colors. When mom asked the teacher what her daughter would learn, she got a stare and a nervous giggle.

Me?  Reading, Writing, Math, History. Hands on learning. I guess I’m too old fashioned to think these stupid tests do anything.

Flag Comment Posted by rjma on July 02, 2009 at 10:02 am

Some history sol test supporters have said that if their is no “hammer of a test” that the material won’t be taught.  But schools have been teaching history and social studies long before there were sol tests.  If the sb says “teach this”, teachers will teach it (whether there’s a test or not)  or they are out of a job.

I know how much politicians like that 93% pass rate as an example of how great the sols are working.  But if they look at those standards and then look at how those standards are measured it’s hard to imagine they would be gloating quite so much.

Flag Comment Posted by TobyKat on July 02, 2009 at 6:06 am

I personally think that putting third graders through these standardized tests is rather apalling. Elementary school should employ creative teaching so young people actually learn, and are not taught to the test. My daughter’s 3rd and 4th grade teachers taught her more history in elementary school than I ever learned, and they did it with creativity that encouraged enthusiasm and actual thinking.

Post a Comment(Requires free registration)

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Online Features
Blogs
DataCenter
Restaurant Guide
Movie Times
 
Video
Breaking News

Advertisement