Star Exponent
Facebook Twitter YouTube
|
 
NewsNews

Officers won't be prosecuted for fondling dog

»  Comments | Post a Comment

RICHMOND -- The five correctional officers charged in October with animal cruelty for fondling a K-9 dog and videotaping the incidents will not be prosecuted.

Powhatan County Commonwealth's Attorney Robert B. Beasley Jr. decided last week not to follow through because he believed the cruelty charges would not stand up in court, he said Wednesday.

"I heard from a couple of veterinarians who told me that, in their opinion, it didn't rise to the level of cruelty," he explained. "One of them told me that no harm can come to the animal through doing that."

Beasley initially filed charges after consulting with the state veterinarian's office.

"When your burden is proof beyond a reasonable doubt, I came to the conclusion that if you have reputable veterinarians in disagreement over the issue, you're not going to be able to prove it in court."

The officers -- one of whom was accused of having sexual contact with the dog while the others watched and filmed -- were training at the Academy for Staff Development in Goochland County to become K-9 handlers.

The incidents took place between June 16 and Aug. 1 across the James River at the Powhatan Correctional Center where the kennels are located, Beasley said.

Initially charged with misdemeanor animal cruelty were Kelvin Thompson, 25, of Chatham; Melvin Boone, 40, of Waverly; and Adam R. Webb, 27, Cheri Campbell, 35, and Anthony Eldridge, 33, all of Burkeville.

Eldridge and Boone no longer work for the Department of Corrections, though the department would not say whether they were dismissed or left voluntarily. Thompson, Webb and Campbell have been removed from the canine program but remain employed by the department.

Terry N. Grimes, a Roanoke attorney representing Thompson, who was accused of fondling the animal, said that the others put him up to it, claiming it would allow him greater control over the dog.

Bestiality in Virginia falls under crimes against nature, which is a felony charge but requires "carnal knowledge" of an animal, implying intercourse.

Terms and Conditions

Advertisement

 
 

Advertisement

Reader Comments

*Facebook Account Required to Comment. If you are not already logged into Facebook, please click the comment button to do so.

Deal of the Day

Advertisement

 

More Ways to Connect

Daily Newsletter

Daily Newsletter

Sign up to receive the latest news sent to your inbox!

Advertisement

 

Most Popular

  • 1.Co. 2 member dies following wreck
  • 2.Culpeper woman hospitalized after ejection
  • 3.Alan Jackson rocks parking lot at Louisa County HS
  • 4.Three charged with grand larceny
  • 5.Dog park proposed at Mountain Run Lake

Advertisement

Media General
KewlBoxBoxerJam: Games & Puzzles
Games, Puzzles & Trivia
Blockdot: Advergaming and Branded Media
Advergaming and Branded Media

MyYahoo!